Experimentos en línea vs presenciales, un procedimiento de Igualación a la muestra
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29059/rpcc.20221201-149Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic raised the need to adapt face-to-face experimental procedures to remote settings, seeking social distancing and confinement. A comparison of the learning in a matching-to-sample task between a group on a traditional experimental situation and an online group is presented. Forty undergraduate students with no previous experience with the experimental task participated. The experiment was conducted in a laboratory and online using SuperLab and SuperLab Remote, respectively. During the training phase participants simulated being defenders of an air raid, and were trained to shoot down enemy airships by choosing one of three comparison stimuli (CoS), in the presence of a specific firing sight (Sample Stimulus, SS); correct responses were reinforced using a 5s VI reinforcement schedule. Results showed similar response rates and percentages of correct responses between groups. The present findings enhance the external validity of the matching-to-sample procedure and suggest using online procedures as viable complements and alternatives to traditional laboratory experimentation.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications with the Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences of the Academic Unit of Legal and Social Sciences, accept the following terms:
a. The authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right to first publish their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License. which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and his first publication are indicated this journal.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the version of the published work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
C. Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through personal communication (e.g. colleagues) before and during the submission process, for purposes of feedback or enrichment of the work, which can produce interesting exchanges