The quality of the scientific report. Notes on the importance, protocols and recommendations.

Authors

  • Ennio Héctor Carro Pérez Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29365/rpcc.20171229-57

Keywords:

scientific quality, scientific diffusion, research report, scientific assessment, peer review

Abstract

Editorial Volume 8 Issue 2

References

Alonso-Coello, P., Rigau, D., Sanabria, A. J., Plaza, V., Miravitlles, M. y Martinez, L. (2013) Calidad y fuerza: el sistema GRADE para la formulación de recomendaciones en las guías de práctica clínica. Archivos de Bronconeumología. 49 (6), pp. 261-267.

Ato, M., López, J.J. y Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología. 29 (3), 1038-1059. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511

Davidoff, F., Batalden, P., Stevens, D., Ogrinc, G., y Mooney, S. (2008). Publication guidelines for quality improvement in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project. Qual Saf Health Care. 17 (Sup. 1), pp. i3-i9. Recuparado el 9 de septiembre de 2015, de http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/. doi:10.1136/qshc.2008.029066

Delgado R., M. y Palma P., S. (2006). Aportaciones de la revisión sistemática y del metaanálisis a la salud pública. Revista Española de Salud Pública. 80 (5), pp. 483-489.

Elm, E., Altman, D., Egger, M., Pocock, S., Gøtzsche, P., y Vandenbroucke, J. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Preventive Medicine. 45, 247-251.

García C., D. y Aboitiz C., J. (2012). Efectividad del entrenamiento de los músculos del suelo pélvico en la incontinencia urinaria: revisión sistemática. Fisioterapia. 34 (2), pp. 87-95.

MacPherson, H., White, A., Cummings, M., Jobst, K., Rose, K. y Niemtzow, R. (2002). Standards for Reporting Interventions in Controlled Trials of Acupuncture: The STRICTA Recommendations. Acupuncture in Medicine. 20 (1), pp. 22-25. Descargado de http://aim.bmj.com/, en Septiembre 10 de 2015.

Moher, D., Schulz, K., y Altman, D. y Grupo CONSORT. (2002). La declaración CONSORT: recomendaciones revisadas para la mejorar la calidad de los informes de ensayos aleatorizados de grupos paralelos. Revista de Sanidad Militar. 56 (1), 23-28.

O’Brien, B., Harris, I.B., Beckman, Th. J., Reed, D. A. y Cook, D.A. (2014). Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research: A Synthesis of Recommendations. Academic Medicine. 89 (9). pp.1245-1251. Recuperado el día 9 de septiembre de 2015, de http://links.lww.com/ACADMED/A218. (doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388)

Sanduvete, S. (2008). Innovaciones metodológicas en la evaluación de la formación continua. Tesis de Doctorado en Aprendizaje y Cognición. Departamento de Psicología Experimental, Universidad de Sevilla.

Shadish, W., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Sánchez-Meca, J. (2005). Evidence-based decision making: Enhancing systematic reviews of program evaluation results in Europe. Evaluation. 11 (1), pp. 95-109.

Stroup, D., Berlin, J., Morton, S., Olkin, I., Williamson, G., Rennie, D., … Thacker, S.B. (2000). Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology. A Proposal for Reporting. Journal American Medical Association. 283 (15), 2008-2012.

Turpin, D. (2005). CONSORT and QUOROM guidelines for reporting randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 128 (6), 681-685.

Tong, A., Sainsbury, P. y Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 19 (6), 349-357

Downloads

Published

2017-12-29

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2017): Julio-Diciembre de 2017

Section

Editorial

License

Those authors who have publications with the Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences of the Academic Unit of Legal and Social Sciences, accept the following terms:

a. The authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right to first publish their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License. which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and his first publication are indicated this journal.

b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the version of the published work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.

C. Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through personal communication (e.g. colleagues) before and during the submission process, for purposes of feedback or enrichment of the work, which can produce interesting exchanges