Beliefs about assessment in the mathematics classroom according to the teacher's academic profile
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29059/rpcc.20240601-176Keywords:
beliefs, teacher beliefs, teaching, learning assessment, academic profileAbstract
The purpose of the study was to identify the beliefs of mathematics teachers about the evaluation of student learning, taking into account their academic profile. Under a quantitative and exploratory-descriptive approach, an instrument designed in a Likert-type format was applied to inquire about teachers' beliefs about assessment. Twenty-nine Mexican mathematics teachers with different academic profiles participated: engineers, graduates in computer science, applied mathematics and graduates in areas related to education. It was found that, despite the fact that the participating teachers are not specifically trained to be teachers, their answers do not evidence some of the most common beliefs in the educational field; rather, they are inclined to give the evaluation process a more reflective sense in their teaching practice. However, it is concluded that the academic profile has an influence on the beliefs of interest, given that, in topics such as the types of evaluation they use and the use they give to the results of this, there were differences between each group of teachers.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications with the Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences of the Academic Unit of Legal and Social Sciences, accept the following terms:
a. The authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right to first publish their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License. which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and his first publication are indicated this journal.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the version of the published work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
C. Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through personal communication (e.g. colleagues) before and during the submission process, for purposes of feedback or enrichment of the work, which can produce interesting exchanges