Bibliometric and content analysis of the scientific production of psychology related to the study of entrepreneurship: towards a new conceptual proposal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29059/rpcc.20201215-123%20Keywords:
entrepreneurship, systematic review, bibliometric analysis, content analysis, entrepreneurial behaviorAbstract
Entrepreneurship has had a recent study boom by various disciplines that have been concerned about the phenomenon, among these is psychology. The aim of this paper was to analyze the work of psychology under a systematic approach to the literature, in order to identify gaps by the discipline in the research of entrepreneurship in which a new conceptual proposal could be inserted. A bibliometric analysis was carried out on 532 scientific texts resulting from inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the main countries, universities and authors who have contributed to the subject were obtained. An inductive content analysis of the most cited texts of the previous sample (n = 15) was also carried out in order to obtain a map of research lines which was confirmed and detailed with a deductive content analysis of the scientific texts with 80% of accumulated citations (n = 100). As a result of this, the possibility of including the study of entrepreneurship from entrepreneurial behavior is contemplated.
References
Abela, J. A. (2002). Las técnicas de análisis de contenido: una revisión actualizada. Fundación Centro de Estudios Andaluces 1-34. Recuperado de: http://public.centrodeestudiosandaluces.es/pdfs/S200103.pdf
Arbeláez, M., & Onrubina, J. (2014). Análisis bibliométrico y de contenido. Dos metodologías complementarias para el análisis de la revista colombiana Educación y Cultura. Revista de Investigaciones• UCM, 14(23), 14-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.22383/ri.v14i1.5
Barlow, D. H. & Hersen, M. (1988). Diseños experimentales de caso único. Estrategias para el estudio del cambio conductual. España: Martínez Roca.
Beltrán, G. (2005). Revisiones sistemáticas de la literatura. Revista Colombiana de Gastroenterología, 20(1), 60-69. Recuperado de: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rcg/v20n1/v20n1a09.pdf
Carlsson, B., Braunerhjelm, P., McKelvey, M., Olofsson, C., Persson, L., & Ylinenpää, H. (2013). The evolving domain of entrepreneurship research. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 913-930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9503-y
Colle, R. (2011). 12º - El análisis de contenido de las Comunicaciones, 2. Técnicas de análisis. España: Sociedad Latina de Comunicación Social, SLCS. Recuperado de: http://www.revistalatinacs.org/067/cuadernos/12_Colle_interior.pdf
Fernández, F. (2002). El análisis de contenido como ayuda metodológica para la investigación. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Cr), 2(96). Recuperado de: https://www.revistacienciassociales.ucr.ac.cr/images/revistas/RCS96/03.pdf
Freixa i Baqué, E. (2003). ¿Qué es conducta? International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 3 (3), 595-613. Recuperado de: http://www.aepc.es/ijchp/articulos_pdf/ijchp-89.pdf
Gartner, W. B. (1988). “Who Is an Entrepreneur?” Is the Wrong Question. American Journal of Small Business, 12(4), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225878801200401
Glasziou, P., Irwig, L., Bain, C., & Colditz, G. (2001). Systematic reviews in health care: a practical guide. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511543500
González, I. F., Urrútia, G., & Alonso-Coello, P. (2011). Revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis: bases conceptuales e interpretación. Revista española de cardiología, 64(8), 688-696. DOI: 10.1016/j.recesp.2011.03.029
Gorgievski, M. J., & Stephan, U. (2016). Advancing the psychology of entrepreneurship: A review of the psychological literature and an introduction. Applied Psychology, 65(3), 437-468. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12073
Ireland, D. & Webb, J. (2007). A cross-disciplinary exploration of entrepreneurship research. Journal of management, 33(6), 891-927. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0149206307307643
Kerlinger, F.N. (1988). Investigación del comportamiento. Técnicas y metodología. México: Editorial Interamericana.
Low, M., & MacMillan, I. (2007). Entrepreneurship: investigación en el pasado y retos para el futuro. En Á. Cuervo, D. Ribeiro & S. Roig, Entrepreneurship: conceptos, teoría y perspectiva (pp. 118-141). Valencia: Fundación Bancaja.
Lozano, J. M. (2009). De patos, gansos y cisnes: Revisiones narrativas, revisiones sistemáticas y meta-análisis de la literatura. Acta Médica Colombiana, 34(2S), 208-210. Recuperado de http://www.actamedicacolombiana.com/ojs/index.php/actamed/article/view/1705
Manchado Garabito, R., Tamames Gómez, S., López González, M., Mohedano Macías, L., D’Agostino, M. & Veiga de Cabo, J. (2009). Revisiones sistemáticas exploratorias. Medicina y seguridad del trabajo, 55(216), 12-19. Recuperado de: http://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/mesetra/v55n216/especial.pdf
Minniti, M. (2012). El emprendimiento y el crecimiento económico de las naciones. Economía industrial, 383, 23-30. Recuperado de: https://www.mincotur.gob.es/Publicaciones/Publicacionesperiodicas/EconomiaIndustrial/RevistaEconomiaIndustrial/383/Mar%C3%ADa%20Minnit.pdf
Muñoz-Justicia, J. & Sahagún-Padilla, M. (2017). Hacer análisis cualitativo con Atlas.ti 7, Manual de uso. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.273997
Nagarajan, K. (2011). A History of Entrepreneurship: Review. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(9), 241-242. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203877326
Poth, C., & Ross, S. (2009). Meta-analysis, systematic review, or scoping review? Comparing methodologies in educational research. In Annual Conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Rodríguez, A. (2009). Nuevas perspectivas para entender el emprendimiento empresarial. Pensamiento Y Gestión, (26), 94-119. Recuperado de: http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/pensamiento/article/viewFile/864/508
Rosero, O., & Molina, S. (2008). Sobre la investigación en emprendimiento. Informes Psicológicos, (10), 29-39. Recuperado de: http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/pdf/ipsi/n10/n10a03.pdf
Santos, F., & Barroso, M., & Guzmán, C. (2013). La economía global y los emprendimientos sociales. Revista de Economía Mundial, (35), 177-196. Recuperado de: https://www.sem-wes.org/sites/default/files/revistas/rem35_10.pdf
Sassmannshausen, S. P., & Volkmann, C. (2013). A bibliometric based review on social entrepreneurship and its establishment as a field of research (No. 2013-003). Schumpeter Discussion Papers. Recuperado de: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.472.427&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Tangarife, A., Giraldo, D., & Sanín, J. (2015). Globalización, Emprendimiento e Innovación en la Ciudad de Medellín: un dispositivo para la construcción de sujetos en el marco de la ciudad capitalista. En VIII Congreso Latinoamericano de Ciencia Política. Lima. Recuperado a partir de http://files.pucp.edu.pe/sistema-ponencias/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Panel-ALACIP.pdf
Veciana, J. (2007). Creación de empresas como programa de investigación científica. En Á. Cuervo, D. Ribeiro & S. Roig, Entrepreneurship: conceptos, teoría y perspectiva (pp. 24-65). Valencia: Fundación Bancaja.
Virgen Ortiz, V., & Cobo Oliveros, C., & Betancourt Guerrero, B. (2014). Análisis bibliométrico del campo de formación de emprendedores. Cuadernos de Administración, 30 (52), 44-53. Recuperado de: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/cuadm/v30n52/v30n52a05.pdf
Referencias citadas en el análisis de contenido deductivo:
Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 87-99. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.87
Cromie, S. (1987). Motivations of aspiring male and female entrepreneurs. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 8(3), 251-261. doi:10.1002/job.4030080306
Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (1997). Values, beliefs and regional variations in new firm formation rates. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18(2-3), 179-199. doi:10.1016/S0167-4870(97)00004-4
Fligstein, N. (1997). Social skill and institutional theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4), 397-405. doi:10.1177/0002764297040004003
Hisrich, R. D. (1990). Entrepreneurship/intrapreneurship. American Psychologist, 45(2), 209-222. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.45.2.209
Johannisson, B. (1988). Business formation - a network approach. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 4(3-4), 83-99. doi:10.1016/0956-5221(88)90002-4
Krauss, S. I., Frese, M., Friedrich, C., & Unger, J. M. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation: A psychological model of success among southern african small business owners. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14(3), 315-344. doi:10.1080/13594320500170227
Lee, J. (1999). Retail niche domination among african american, jewish, and korean entrepreneurs: Competition, coethnic advantage and disadvantage. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(9), 1398-1416. doi:10.1177/00027649921954967
Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., & Allen, J. (2005). The entrepreneur's business model: Toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 726-735. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.11.001
Obschonka, M., Schmitt-Rodermund, E., Silbereisen, R. K., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2013). The regional distribution and correlates of an entrepreneurship-prone personality profile in the united states, germany, and the United Kingdom: A socioecological perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(1), 104-122. doi:10.1037/a0032275
Parasuraman, S., Purohit, Y. S., Godshalk, V. M., & Beutell, N. J. (1996). Work and family variables, entrepreneurial career success, and psychological well-being. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 48(3), 275-300. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1996.0025
Raposo, M., & do Paço, A. (2011). Entrepreneurship education: Relationship between education and entrepreneurial activity. [Educación emprendedora: Relación entre educación y actividad emprendedora] Psicothema, 23(3), 453-457. Retrieved from http://www.psicothema.com/pdf/3909.pdf
Rauch, A., & Frese, M. (2007). Let's put the person back into entrepreneurship research: A meta-analysis on the relationship between business owners' personality traits, business creation, and success. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16(4), 353-385. doi:10.1080/13594320701595438
Rothenberg, S. (2007). Environmental managers as institutional entrepreneurs: The influence of institutional and technical pressures on waste management. Journal of Business Research, 60(7), 749-757. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.02.017
Schmitt-Rodermund, E. (2004). Pathways to successful entrepreneurship: Parenting, personality, early entrepreneurial competence, and interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(3), 498-518. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2003.10.007
Verheul, I., Thurik, R., Grilo, I., & Van der Zwan, P. (2012). Explaining preferences and actual involvement in self-employment: Gender and the entrepreneurial personality. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(2), 325-341. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2011.02.009
Weiler, S., & Bernasek, A. (2001). Dodging the glass ceiling? networks and the new wave of women entrepreneurs. Social Science Journal, 38(1), 85-103. doi:10.1016/S0362-3319(00)00111-7
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications with the Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences of the Academic Unit of Legal and Social Sciences, accept the following terms:
a. The authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right to first publish their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License. which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and his first publication are indicated this journal.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the version of the published work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
C. Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through personal communication (e.g. colleagues) before and during the submission process, for purposes of feedback or enrichment of the work, which can produce interesting exchanges
