Negotiation skills and risk-benefit calculation in a sample of sex workers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29059/rpcc.20200617-110Keywords:
negotiation skills, argumentation, mental flexibility, risk-benefit calculation, sex workeAbstract
The present study of quantitative approach and correlational level was oriented to identify the management of negotiation skills and the calculation of risk-benefit in a sample of sex workers. The Ne-go test and the card game task that is part of the Banfe neuropsychological battery were used. The results show a low level of management of the negotiation skills and the middle level in the ability to make decisions in uncertain conditions. Also, the results suggest that a higher educational level is related to greater flexibility, a better argumentative level and less hostility towards the interlocutor. Likewise, the advance in the age of the participants indicate a tendency towards a less flexibility and less proactive positions in the negotiation process. And, finally, was observed a moderate positive relationship between the cognitive ability to assess a situation under uncertain conditions and the argu-ment variable, indicating the importance of cognitive skills, in general, and the calculation of risk-benefit, in particular, to achieve better argumentati-on in the negotiation process.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications with the Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences of the Academic Unit of Legal and Social Sciences, accept the following terms:
a. The authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right to first publish their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License. which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and his first publication are indicated this journal.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the version of the published work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
C. Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through personal communication (e.g. colleagues) before and during the submission process, for purposes of feedback or enrichment of the work, which can produce interesting exchanges